He is speaking and he is listening, and that is maya. If you understand this maya, you will understand this whole truth. He is speaking. He is listening to you, because he is the giver of the breath. He gives me breath to speak and he gives you breath to listen. If you understand this secret, you understand everything. Kindness is the natural expression of the first Sutra of the Aquarian Age: Recognize that the other person is you is the act of recognizing that another person is your own kind.
The person i admire essay - choose Expert and Cheap
Who is influencing you? Related articles Posted on Sunday, categories: book riffs, thinkers Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in the post above are affiliate links. This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, i will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, i only recommend products or services i use personally and believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the federal Trade commissions 16 cfr, part 255 : guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising. Our theme for 2013 is the first sutra statement of Yogi Bhajan's five sutras of the Aquarian Age: Recognize that the other person is you. In me, i have found only one reality—that I breathe in and I breathe out. And so anything that breathes in or out is reality. When I found this as a reality in everybody, i found myself in everybody and everybody in myself. Yogi Bhajan from The teachings of Yogi Bhajan,. There is no difference between you and.
This idea is strategys most fundamental business concept. Its every companys holy grail. And its no longer relevant for more and more companies. In this book, i take on the idea of sustainable competitive advantage and argue that executives need to stop basing their strategies. In its place, i offer a perspective on strategy that is based on the idea of transient competitive advantage: that to win in volatile and uncertain environments, executives need to learn how to exploit short-lived opportunities with speed and decisiveness. I argue that the deeply ingrained structures and systems that executives rely on to extract maximum value from a competitive advantage are liabilities outdated and even dangerous in a fastmoving competitive environment. This is important work. Im looking forward to the book. These are five thinkers that have influenced me recently.
Big bet ventures in our experience seldom work out. As paul Hobcraft pointed out to me recently, she is expanding on this issue in her forthcoming book the End of Competitive advantage. Here is how she introduces the key ideas in the book: Strategy is stuck. If you dropped into a boardroom discussion or an executive team meeting, chances are youd hear a lot of strategic thinking based on ideas and frameworks designed in, and for, a different era. the biggies such as Michael Porters five forces analysis, bcgs growth-share matrix for analyzing corporate portfolios, and Hamel and Prahalads core competence of the firm are all tremendously important ideas. Many strategies today are still informed by them. But virtually all strategy frameworks and tools in use today are based on a single dominant idea: that the purpose of strategy is to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
The person i admire essay, the, friary School
This attribution is rarely made, but its actually correct. Franklin was a brilliant scientist (see this biography for more information ) until her career was cut unnaturally short by cancer. Her dna research was creative, while her approach to science was determined. We could use more like her. Rita gunther McGrath The lifespan of the average competitive advantage continues to shrink. This means that traditional approaches to strategy are becoming decreasingly useful.
This is an issue where rita McGrath is doing important work. She has already demonstrated listing the importance of making staged investments in innovation, rather than big bets. Here is how she frames it: In highly uncertain environments, its nearly impossible to predict with any accuracy which innovations are likely to succeed and which are not. It makes sense, therefore, to test out a number of different approaches on a small scale, proceeding forward only when youve validated enough assumptions to move ahead with confidence. The logic of real options supports this approach: essentially encouraging companies to take out a couple of different projects aimed at a promising market or technology, without huge risks.
I want you to leave it, as I do, imagining, reflecting, questioning. Managers are only as good as their ability to work things out thoughtfully in their own way. To repeat, this is a job of paradoxes, dilemmas, and mysteries that cannot be resolved. The only guaranteed result of any formula for managing is failure (including, of course, this one). When you think of managing in this way, the valerias point about the importance of conversation becomes more critical.
So does Terris discussion of the interactions between technologies, people and processes. Mintzbergs work is well worth checking out. Rosalind Franklin, this is the scan that led researchers to the discovery of the structure of dna: Since everyone knows that Watson and Crick discovered dna, then this scan must be theirs, right? Wrong. This scan was done by rosalind Franklin. I was reminded of her story while reading. Nonsense on Stilts by, massimo pigliucci, where he credits the discovery of dnas structure to watson, Crick and Franklin.
The, person, i admire, most, essay - 1069 Palabras Cram
Mintzbergs description of management is the one that really rings true with my experience as both a manager and one who studies them. This is from his book. Managing pdf : Most of the work that can be programmed in an organization need not concern its managers directly; specialists can. That leaves the managers with much of the messy stuff—the intractable problems, the complicated connections. This is what makes the practice of managing so fundamentally soft, and why labels such as experience, intuition, judgment, and wisdom are so commonly needed to describe. Put together a good deal of craft with the right touch of art alongside some use of science, and you end up with a job that is above all a practice. There is no one best way to manage; it depends on the situation. i dont want you to leave this book knowing.
The Plugged-In Manager makes the case that being plugged-in—the ability to see choices across each of an organizations dimensions of people, your technology, and organizational processes and then to mix them together into new and powerful organizational strategies, structures, and practices—may be the most important capability. I think that this is absolutely correct and my class did too. This framework showed up in a couple of their final reports. Terri is at the leading edge of management thinking and research, and I love her work. Henry mintzberg, another person at this leading edge is Henry mintzberg. ive been reading a lot of his work recently. he is one of the leading proponents of the idea that the most important form of strategy for organisations is emergent strategy the routines and approaches that occur as we respond to our changing environments.
it is insufficient to think only about tools you must instead consider technology, people and proceses, and how these three systems interact. This is how she describes the objectives of the book: too often discussions of management practice focus exclusively on managing people and organizational issues. Rarely, however, do they incorporate a discussion about technology or address all three dimensions in a balanced way. When they do, the result is game changing. In our hypercompetitive environment, those managers who are outstanding at being plugged into their people, technology, and organizational processes simultaneously excel at coming up with effective business solutions.
As you would expect from the name conversation Agent, she thinks a lot about how discussion drives business, and idea that i also looked at in talk is the technology of leadership. In doing this, she is putting an increasing focus on listening to form genuine connections with people. In a post on the importance of making real-life connections, she says: do you have enough diversity and autonomy in your life? How well do you listen to others? Are you open to multiple cultures outside your own? All good reasons to stop seeking (fake) links, and start making connections. Valeria is a strategist, and an outstanding one at that. If youre not business familiar with her work, you should check it out. Here is one of her short talks: Terri Griffith, in one of my exec ed courses earlier this year, one idea really seemed to stick with the people in the class.
' the person i admire the most Is Mahatma gandhi - free
Who do you admire the most? Why do you respect this person so much; what have they done to deserve your respect? A couple of weeks ago i wrote about five thinkers that i admire, and today id like to highlight five more that have influenced how Im thinking recently. Valeria maltoni, ive admired Valerias work on her blog. Conversation Agent for a number of years now. Today, i was fortunate enough to meet her in person. Our discussion was wide-ranging, and we touched on a number of interesting ideas. Valeria one of the best thinkers around on the topic of how firms actually work. She is starting to place more focus on the importance fuller of executing ideas, which is an area that is often an innovation problem.